Comments on: I’ve Looked at Crowds From Both Sides Now http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/ Information Architected is a consultancy focused on the intelligent use of content, knowledge and processes to drive innovation and thrive in a digital world. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:23:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: staffing1 http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-578 staffing1 Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:46:22 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-578 Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot.<br><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow">www.staffingpower.com</a> Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot.
http://www.staffingpower.com

]]> By: Tyler Kevin http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-564 Tyler Kevin Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:46:22 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-564 Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot. Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot.

]]> By: powerstaffing55 http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-562 powerstaffing55 Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:47:27 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-562 Hii im john and <a href="http://bit.ly/2R2p1E" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2R2p1E</a> this stie helpful for us. Thanks Hii im john and http://bit.ly/2R2p1E this stie helpful for us. Thanks

]]> By: BobJ http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-490 BobJ Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:48 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-490 previous post was corrupted a bit...i repost and correct here...<br><br>"i read the article, and i still wonder if ANYONE really has a good clue as to what 'Web 2.0' really "is" -- or is it just an amorphous term used to group technologies and systems dependent upon the "minimalist" approach to privacy (e.g. facebook, twitter, blogs, etc.) on the internet (and in general) these days, and the techniques used to exploit them? and this 'crowd' approach to 'authoriing' and so on, well...oi! it seems to me we've come to point where we need to re-think a lot of how we look at and do certain things these days...or am i just being too cynical and old fashioned? previous post was corrupted a bit…i repost and correct here…

“i read the article, and i still wonder if ANYONE really has a good clue as to what 'Web 2.0' really “is” — or is it just an amorphous term used to group technologies and systems dependent upon the “minimalist” approach to privacy (e.g. facebook, twitter, blogs, etc.) on the internet (and in general) these days, and the techniques used to exploit them? and this 'crowd' approach to 'authoriing' and so on, well…oi! it seems to me we've come to point where we need to re-think a lot of how we look at and do certain things these days…or am i just being too cynical and old fashioned?

]]> By: BobJ http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-489 BobJ Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:03:14 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-489 i read the article, and i still wonder if ANYONE really has a good clue as to what 'Web 2.0' really "is" -- or is it just an amorphous term used to group technologies and systems dependent upon the "minimalist" approach to privacy (e.g. facebook, twitter, blogs, etc.) on the internet (and in general) these days, and the techniques used to exploit ... Read Morethem? and this 'crowd' approach to 'authoriing' and so on, well...oi! it seems to me we've come to point where we need to re-think a lot of how we look at and do certain things these days...or am i just being too cynical and old fashioned? i read the article, and i still wonder if ANYONE really has a good clue as to what 'Web 2.0' really “is” — or is it just an amorphous term used to group technologies and systems dependent upon the “minimalist” approach to privacy (e.g. facebook, twitter, blogs, etc.) on the internet (and in general) these days, and the techniques used to exploit … Read Morethem? and this 'crowd' approach to 'authoriing' and so on, well…oi! it seems to me we've come to point where we need to re-think a lot of how we look at and do certain things these days…or am i just being too cynical and old fashioned?

]]> By: Rick Ladd http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Rick Ladd Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:36:57 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-488 Dan - Thanks for pointing me here, nepotistic as it may seem :) The kind of response to new ideas Carl has characterized here is an everyday occurrence at my stodgy old aerospace company, though there are glimmers of hope, as we discussed. I'm especially fond of your point about Marketing and Sales being important internally as well. Good stuff! Dan – Thanks for pointing me here, nepotistic as it may seem :) The kind of response to new ideas Carl has characterized here is an everyday occurrence at my stodgy old aerospace company, though there are glimmers of hope, as we discussed. I'm especially fond of your point about Marketing and Sales being important internally as well. Good stuff!

]]> By: Bob Leonard http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-487 Bob Leonard Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:14:21 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-487 This is a disconnect with the Ogilvy content, but I am reacting to the 'like-mindedness'. Found your blog because I'm focusing more and more on info mgmt - see massive opportunity with the explosive growth of unstructured content AND concurrent need for control catalyzed by increasing regulations. This is a disconnect with the Ogilvy content, but I am reacting to the 'like-mindedness'. Found your blog because I'm focusing more and more on info mgmt – see massive opportunity with the explosive growth of unstructured content AND concurrent need for control catalyzed by increasing regulations.

]]> By: dankeldsen http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-486 dankeldsen Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:00:43 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-486 Bob - Interesting, have been re-reading Ogilvy, John Caple and Claude Hopkins recently - seems we're of like minds. Marketing and sales applies just as much to internal work as it does to the consumer-facing public - and I work to help both sides of the coin to see where these skills can and NEED to be applied in many situations. Bob – Interesting, have been re-reading Ogilvy, John Caple and Claude Hopkins recently – seems we're of like minds. Marketing and sales applies just as much to internal work as it does to the consumer-facing public – and I work to help both sides of the coin to see where these skills can and NEED to be applied in many situations.

]]> By: Bob Leonard http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-485 Bob Leonard Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:57:47 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-485 Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot. Oh. I get it now. Feel like an idiot.

]]> By: dankeldsen http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/ive-looked-at-crowds-from-both-sides-now/comment-page-1/#comment-484 dankeldsen Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:14:52 +0000 http://www.informationarchitected.com/?p=1483#comment-484 Bob - Woozio (the traffic widget you're seeing) isn't always accurate on location, likely it's mistaking Napa for Sonoma. Good catch though. Interesting to see who's stopping by, eh? Bob – Woozio (the traffic widget you're seeing) isn't always accurate on location, likely it's mistaking Napa for Sonoma. Good catch though. Interesting to see who's stopping by, eh?

]]>