Comments on: “NOW knowledge management is possible” – Whaddya Kidding me?

By: Informationoverlord » Blog Archive » KM and E2.0

Informationoverlord » Blog Archive » KM and E2.0 — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:48:35 +0000

[...] links to a post by Carl Frappaolo entitled “NOW knowledge management is possible – Whaddya Kidding me?” which looks at whether E2.0 is causing an “evolution” or a “revolution” in [...]

By: kumbhkarni

kumbhkarni — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:00:00 +0000

RT @tweetmeme “NOW knowledge management is possible” - Whaddya Kidding me? | Information Architected http://tinyurl.com/m4tfl6 This comment was originally posted on Twitter

By: Does KM need social media? « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog

Does KM need social media? « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:30:14 +0000

[...] That’s a quote from a recent paper by Andy Moore, publisher of KMWorld. It’s sparked a fire for some in the industry, including Carl Frappaolo, who brought the quote under scrutiny last week in a post on InformationArchitectedInc. [...]

By: ms_lbd

ms_lbd — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:32:00 +0000

RT @CMac123: “NOW knowledge management is possible - Whaddya Kidding me?” (InfoArchitected Inc) http://is.gd/1xcCn This comment was originally posted on Twitter

By: CMac123

CMac123 — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:22:00 +0000

“NOW knowledge management is possible - Whaddya Kidding me?” (InfoArchitected Inc) http://is.gd/1xcCn This comment was originally posted on Twitter

By: aracycampos

aracycampos — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:41:00 +0000

RT @tweetmeme “NOW knowledge management is possible” - Whaddya Kidding me? | Information Architected http://tinyurl.com/m4tfl6 This comment was originally posted on Twitter

By: Carl Frappaolo

Carl Frappaolo — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:01 +0000

In response to the comment from @rotkapchen – aka Paul Thorton:
Normally I just try to ignore asinine shock value journalism. “KM has been DOA for year”, maybe in your case. I should just ignore this – but hey I am on a roll in trying to purge the market of such inane yellow journalism disguised as thought leadership by those that are hoping it will help keep them in the limelight.
But before I go on I find it hard to argue with Paula’s statement until she gives us her definition of KM. KM has been DOA for years – what exactly are you saying is DOA? Please provide us with your succinct definition and I assure you I will debate with you. Please do not cloud it or hide behind statements like “I understand the initial intent of KM”. We are not arguing “intent” – your statement is that KM has been DOA. So define KM and then lets debate.

By: Carl Frappaolo

Carl Frappaolo — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:18:00 +0000

By: Nick Milton

Nick Milton — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:41:05 +0000

Excellent post, thanks

By: Nick Milton

Nick Milton — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:41:00 +0000

Excellent post, thanks